1. What emotions did you feel as you worked your way through these images?
the first image was happy and cheerful, then as the images progressed I began to feel sad.
2. The photographer said this: "These photographs do not define us, but they are us." What do you think about this comment now that you have looked at the photos?
They are depicting 100% truth of the people.
3. Do you think you could shoot photos like this if you were in this situation?
No, I would be to sad to do anything but help.
4. If you could write Angelo a letter, what would you say to him?
You are the strongest photographer alive.
"Edward Snowden didn't want to be photographed. He wanted his actions--leaking classified NSA files--to be the focus of any story, not his face. But. But. Being shot by Platon, who has photographed world leaders like Dick Cheney, George Bush (both of them), and Vladimir Putin, puts him on the same level as those subjects, elevating his message. So out of complicated motivations comes a tense and compelling photograph. As Snowden holds the flag, his face and his hands convey both respect and hurt--a flickering combination of protectiveness and vulnerability. Words would tip the reader toward a single interpretation. So. No design. No cover lines. Just an image, however you choose to look at it." - See more at: http://www.magazine.org/asme/magazine-cover-contest/past-winners-finalists/2015-winners-finalists#sthash.FbVao6Gj.dpuf
Critique:
I like this cover because the picture is very simple, the persons face and upper body combined with the flag on an extremely simple white background make for a very appealing cover. There is no distraction from a complicated background or distractions in the foreground. Just a portrait and the flag make for a simple yet appealing photograph for this magazine cover. It also holds meaning as the flag is held in a way that shows he may of damaged something that the flag represents or hurt people who represent the flag. The exposure is very good as the lighting and other elements do show that the photograph is well produced and thought out. The photographer is very talented. In conclusion, I really like this cover due to its simplicity and subtle meaning.
1Her face was brightened and her eyes were enlarged. her hair was also elongated.
2Her eyes were enlarged. and her legs were elongated, and also her skin was brightened significantly. She was drastically changed.
3her skin tone was deepened and her body was significantly downsized. her hair was also elongated.
4. Is it ethically acceptable to change a person's appearance like these in a photo? Why or why not?
no, it is hiding their inner beauty.
5. Are there circumstances in which it would be more ethically wrong to do this type of manipulation?
in modeling and photos that are meant to show the real person.
6. What types of changes are OK, and what aren't?
Ok changes would be like cropping out distractions or blurring faces for privacy.
7. Explain what you think the differences are between fashion photography and photojournalism.
Fashion is about depicting people and models, and photojournalism is depicting stories and events.
8. What relationship does each type of photography have to reality, and how does this affect the ethical practice of each?
Photojounralism is often not manipulated and depicts real events. Fashions photography is about mainly people.
9. Why do you think I am showing you these three videos?
To show how fashion photography works, and also the changes and manipulations made in the fashion industry.
10. Why are none of these videos about guys???
Because women are often more appealing to the masses then men are.
1
informal
2
Formal
3
formal
4
formal
5
formal
6
environmental
7
environmental
8
formal
9
informal
10
informal/
11
formal
12
formal
13
enviromenal
14
formal
15
informal
16
informal
17
formal
18
informal